[ambush]

Originally Posted by pxs007

haan de do

From what I read, a higher risk with anal sex is seen when partners:
1) do not use condoms at the same rate as in vaginal sex.
2) do not lubricate the anal passage well enough to mitigate tissue tearing risk.

-if you stick your dick without condom into an infected persons ass you have 18 times as much chance of getting aids than if you stick the same dick without condom into a infected vag.

The facts are as simple as that.

Whether anal sex enthusiasts or homosexual males indulge in unprotected sex is a whole other matter. So is whether its unnatural, whether it should be legalized.

[razortooth]

Originally Posted by ambush

-if you stick your dick without condom into an infected persons ass you have 18 times as much chance of getting aids than if you stick the same dick without condom into a infected vag.

The facts are as simple as that.

Whether anal sex enthusiasts or homosexual males indulge in unprotected sex is a whole other matter. So is whether its unnatural, whether it should be legalized.

Prolly coz anus is very small, and tearing of tissues and blood contact have higher chances.
where as in Vag, those are big, and in few cases there might not be any contact with blood...

Moral of the story: always f**k old lame whores your chances to get HIV will be minimum.

[an0va]

Originally Posted by razortooth

Prolly coz anus is very small, and tearing of tissues and blood contact is have higher chances.
where as in Vag, those are big, and in few cases there might not be any contact with blood...

Moral of the story: always f**k old lame whores your chances to get HIV will be minimum.

[pxs007]

Originally Posted by ambush

-if you stick your dick without condom into an infected persons ass you have 18 times as much chance of getting aids than if you stick the same dick without condom into a infected vag.

The facts are as simple as that.

Just because you say so?. I will say this again - show a well documented fact.

Whether anal sex enthusiasts or homosexual males indulge in unprotected sex is a whole other matter. So is whether its unnatural, whether it should be legalized.

+1.

Originally Posted by The baggie

Lol...
This thread discussion is quite informative about AIDS but what exbi's doc are doing come out clear it.
Dr. Deepak

Let's get back to the original topic then. What do you think of the SC's stand?

[ambush]

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=T...0myths&f=false

[Past Master]

There are many other things and issues which need to be monitored and solved rather than peeping in someone else's bedroom.

[The baggie]

Originally Posted by pxs007

Let's get back to the original topic then. What do you think of the SC's stand?

I dont know any psychology behind homosexuality so i m nobudy to judge whether its natural or not.
However some experts in this say that its natural so i support sc's judment.

[ambush]

Doesn't matter if its natural or unnatural. Its personal choice and its between consenting adults.

[The baggie]

Originally Posted by ambush

Doesn't matter if its natural or unnatural. Its personal choice and its between consenting adults.

If its personal choice then sc should not have problem with drugs and prostitution.

[razortooth]

@ the baggie... tomorrow you will say that Drinking and driving should also be legal.